Crusades and Sicilian Vespers - Bloody nefarious Byzantine war shaped Europe

Bloody nefarious Byzantine war

The Final Trial: Palestine Cry: ANTICHRIST FREEMASONIC ZIO-COMMUNIST VATICANISTAS


Palestine Cry: ANTICHRIST FREEMASONIC ZIO-COMMUNIST VATICANISTAS


MY COMMENT

The Final Trial: Holy, holy, holy Lord God Almighty, Who is and Who was and Who is to come

St. Francis was the bright shining light in the middle of the nefarious affair of the colonizing of the Holy Land for political ambition begun by the Byzantine Emperor (Alexius Comnenus - his predecessor Michael VII desired it, but it didn't happen until Alexius) and Pope Urban II (who answered Alexius' call). St. Francis went to the Sultan of Egypt, Malik-al-Kamil, the nephew of Saladin, and did not insult his faith, but instead prayed with him. The Sultan was so moved by St. Francis, that upon his leaving he presented St. Francis with a horn used by the muezzin to call people to prayer five times a day. St. Francis used that horn thereafter to call his fellow Christians to prayer with when he returned to Italy. To commemorate his meeting with St. Francis and the profound impact of meeting a true Christian, the Sultan’s tomb was engraved with this, that what changed his (the Sultan’s) life was the meeting between a Christian monk (St. Francis) and the sultan in his tent. The Sultan remained a devout Muslim the rest of his life.

This impression of the real honest decency of a true Christian is what was the reason that, when the Palestinian patriots (both Christian and Muslim together) threw out the Colonizing Freemasonic Crusader Invaders, the only European Christians allowed to remain by the Muslim rulers were the Franciscans. The Franciscans were even given charge over the Christian sites of the Holy Land by the Muslim rulers.

Concerning Saladin:

THE CRUSADES 1095-1291:

“Saladin's lasting reputation among Christians, as a man of chivalry and honour, derives above all from his treatment of the inhabitants of Jerusalem. The contrast, eighty-eight years earlier, with the behaviour of the crusaders in Jerusalem could not be greater. Instead of pillage and massacre, there is an orderly handing over of the city. Holy places are respected. A ransom is to be paid for each Christian to depart in freedom, but it is not high. Among those who cannot afford it, many are released by Saladin instead of being sold into slavery.

To the very end, the Christian authorities set an appalling example. The patriarch, after buying his freedom with ten dinars, departs with wagonloads of valuable treasure which could have been used to free fellow Christians.”

[End of excert of THE CRUSADES]

Concerning the Crusaders:

The very first Crusaders were well received by the Muslim overlords for especially the example set by the original St. John Hospitallers (before their Freemasonic corruption) who helped Muslims and as well as Christians with medical aid and protected both of them against the criminal thieves in the area. Later the Vatican showed its true colors when a Cardinal had the Crusaders slaughter all the inhabitants of Jersualem including the Catholics in union with Rome that lived there – which the Crusaders had informed the Cardinal were there. “God knows His own , kill them all,” was the Cardinal’s response; the horrified Crusaders did what they were told.

The vain attempt by the Vatican of today to cover their Antichrist occult Satanic Devil worship of the Assisi interreligious prayer meetings with mentioning St. Francis is absurd. Neither St. Francis nor the Sultan would have anything to do with the Vatican today. Neither do any faithful Catholics. I was baptized (by a Franciscan priest as a matter of fact) years before Vatican II and it would violate my baptism and profession of faith in Christ to have anything to do with the Antichrist, ad-Dajjal, slave that the Vatican is today.

The Crusades brought back the Hermetic Satanic Magic that forms the basis for Freemasonry and that is what has totally corrupted and destroyed the Vatican in terms of any real confession of Christian faith by them. Muslims know this and faithful to Christ Catholics know this.

The Illuminati: The Core of the Illuminati

Right to Life: Sicilian Vespers: Bloody clash shaped Europe


Constantinople and the Roman Emperor, the true source of the Crusades and the resultant rape of Constantinople and which brought about the dissolution of a United Europe under the Papacy - this also brought in the the Middle Eastern Banking/Usury into Europe by way of the Phanariot district in Constantinople through Venice and into Central Europe. The Sicilian Vespers was caused by the Emperor in Constantinople. The Sicilian Vespers created the Mafia and in turn they were the model for much of the Revolutionary Anarchists that destroyed European civilization. They were also the model for the Irish and Jew Mobs later in American History, especially in Boston and Chicago and Canada. the Mafia is a close ally with the Freemasonic Vatican Jesuits/SMOM and the CIA.

Sicilian Vespers: Bloody clash shaped Europe

By A.N Wilson

12:01AM BST 07 Apr 2008

The Sicilian Vespers is a phrase which refers to a bloody incident which took place on Easter Monday, 1282. At the Church of the Holy Spirit, half a mile to the south-east of Palermo, French officials mingled with the crowds to join in the festivities as the bells rang for evening prayer. The French were "overfamiliar" with some of the Sicilian women. Scuffles broke out. Daggers were drawn. Soon there were cries in the Sicilian dialect of "Death to the Frenchmen" ("Moranu li Franchiski!").

By nightfall, 2,000 French people in Palermo were dead, and the uprising spread to the other Sicilian towns. The outbreaks were not spontaneous: they had been planned by the enemies of the French – notably the Emperor in Constantinople and the King of Aragon. The long dominance of the island by Charles of Anjou was over.

Charles, the most powerful figure in the Mediterranean, had been on the point of invading Constantinople. Egged on by a succession of French, or Francophile, Popes, he had hoped not merely to regain Byzantium for the West, but also to subjugate the Eastern Orthodox Church to the authority of the Papacy.

With the Sicilian Vespers, there died any possibility of a universal Papacy dominating Christendom. The foundations had been laid for the phenomena that shaped modern Europe – the development of nation states, and, ultimately, of Protestantism. It is 50 years since Sir Steven Runciman's masterly book The Sicilian Vespers was published by the Cambridge University Press. It is one of those timeless works of history which is also a great work of literature.

Within less than 300 pages, he tells the whole complicated story of 13th century Mediterranean history – the struggles of the Hohenstaufen dynasty to maintain their power as Holy Roman Emperors after the death of Frederick II; the growth of the power of Aragon; the political machinations by the Popes; the doggedness of the Byzantine emperor Michael Paleologus. There is a supporting cast of dozens – it is a wonder that Runciman has made them all so vivid and yet the reader feel no muddle as his tale unfolds.

The story is about a single incident that fundamentally altered the whole course of European history. Yet out of all the details of rivalry between Guelf and Ghibelline, between French and German, between Angevin and Byzantine, there emerges an image as crystalline as a painting by Van Eyck. At the centre of it all is the chilly, unamiable figure of Charles of Anjou himself (brother of St Louis IX). Runciman wrote with wonderful eloquence, but he never overwrote. His narrative flows uncluttered by needless reference notes – there are some, but they nearly all refer to primary sources. His is the supreme example of a well-stocked mind not needing to show off all its wares.

Nor does he impede the central story by tedious allusion to secondary sources, and what Professor X thinks of Professor Y’s views of Professor Z. Instead, with a gentle, slightly mournful, multilingual guide, we are back in the Middle Ages themselves. He refers to Ottokar II of Bohemia or Pope Innocent IV as if he had known them personally, which, in a way, he had. As a background to much of the story is the extraordinary tale of Sicily itself, colonised first by Greeks, then by Byzantines, then by Muslims, then by the Normans.

Sicily was a genuinely multiethnic and multicultural society. Those who criticised the Archbishop of Canterbury recently for suggesting that there could exist parallel legal systems should read of the Sicilian model, where Muslim courts existed side by side with Christian ones. Everything worked well. It was when the French attempted to impose a monolithic structure on the fluid Sicilians that trouble started. The bloodiness is recounted with Homeric sorrow, but not without humour.

This historical masterpiece ends with the charming story of King Henry IV of France boasting in the 16th century to the Spanish ambassador that he could subdue the Spanish in Italy should the King of Spain try his patience too far. "I will breakfast in Milan, and I will dine in Rome," he crowed. To which the ambassador replied: "Then Your Majesty will doubtless be in Sicily in time for Vespers."